The piece is entitled Hillary-Hatred Derangement Syndrome. It’s not exactly an editorial, but the author, Dorothy Rabinowitz, is a member of the Journal’s editorial board. A Pulitzer Prize winner, she was a fan of John McCain, and also covered one of the early Bill Clinton scandals.
After cataloging a number of Trump’s more outlandish statements and behaviors, notably his feud with Rosie O’Donnell, and his bromance with Putin, she lays the wood to his blind followers.
She describes Sec. Clinton rather archly as the “educated former Secretary of State, with lengthy experience in government.” Not to say she is totally in the Clinton camp: she refers to “scandals” though we don’t know what she means with that, apparently the nothingness of emails, Bengazi and Foundation. Plus, Rabinowitz was either offended or bored by some comments made by Clinton regarding killing of some of our unarmed darker skinned citizens by police.
She ends the piece with the typical Republican slither: She slams Trump in the most forceful terms, gives Clinton faint praise, but won’t endorse Hillary, or say that she is voting for her.
It will be either Mr. Trump or Mrs. Clinton—experienced, forward-looking, indomitably determined, and eminently sane. Her election alone is what stands between the American nation and the reign of the most unstable, proudly uninformed, psychologically unfit president ever to enter the White House.